Wednesday, April 13, 2016

Click, save, FORGET -- Times Life article

 mind matters Click, save, FORGET

Author : Nona Walia ; The Times of India
Article Date : 04/10/2016 Link-  http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/index.aspx?EID=31813&dt=20160410#

Has our excessively photographed and filtered lives stopped us from making real memories and connections?
You meet an old friend at a coffee shop, click pictures, have a great time, and share it on social media. At a restaurant, as soon as the food is served, out comes your camera for the droolworthy shot that's going to make people on your timeline go green. Did you get to have that heart to heart with your friend, savour the food served on the table? No.

Why? Because...
...IF YOU DON'T CLICK IT, YOU DON'T FEEL IT
Says photographer Anusha Yadav of The Indian Memory Project, “Earlier, a photograph in a family album triggered a memory; the photograph itself wasn't the memory. We aren't making memories
anymore. The photograph that you take with your smartphone shows only the mood of the moment, and is forgotten in 10 minutes; memories are something you remember, and if you don't remember, then it's not a memory. In 15 years' time, you won't go through 25 lakh pictures to see what you ate on a particular day."

EVERY-DAY VISUAL VALIDATION
Nobel Prizewinner and renowned psychologist professor Daniel Kahneman who extensively studies the elusive happiness quotient has talked about people essentially having two selves: the experiencing self and the remembering self. To put it simply, the experiencing self lives in the present and makes minutetominute
memories, and the remembering self retains what's important, what touches the heart, what eventually becomes longterm memory. The remembering self is what nostalgia is made of. It's those few
moments you can cherish years later. Our experiencing self, on the contrary, keeps track of our everyday memories which are impossible to retain on the whole by any human brain.
        Now imagine what would happen if this experiencing self overtakes the remembering self... That's what's happening right now. Internet expert Chetan Deshpande says, “Life wouldn't be complete without your shared post being acknowledged. We need visual validation on a daily basis. What matters is what's happening right now and capturing it on camera."

CURATED MEMORIES
Even before you dress, you think about what would look good on camera, and which filters to use. A cool coffee mug with a book at a cafe, with your favourite filter, will get you a lot of `likes'. So, before you have taken the picture, you have anticipated the moment of acknowledgement; you have curated the memory instead of living in the moment, and then having a memory of it later. Psychologist Kahneman calls this `anticipated memory', where “we've become accustomed to categorising moments as memories
even before they cease to be experiences".
           Deshpande adds, “In the quest of anticipated memory, the real connection is lost. For eg., just to `capture' the perfect moment, lovers lose an intimate moment that could have been a lifelong
memory in their minds. In this Culture of Cool, people don't have the patience to wait for a moment that would actually be
worthy of remembrance they'd rather create it.“ But can you really call these perfect moments memory?
          Student Aishwarya Nangia, 17, explains, “This generation believes it's only as attractive as the last uploaded picture. There's immense pressure to create a conceited selfimage through our favourite filters. This keeps us from knowing our true selves or experiencing a real moment of connection."

WHY THE BRAIN CAN'T RETAIN MEMORIES ANYMORE...
There is a neurological fallout of the addiction to click and store. Neurologist Dr Shirish M Hastak believes digital storage has limited our mind's capacity to retain memories. “Our brain normally processes 120 bits of information per second.Hence, we frequently cannot register information beyond a certain limit. The dilemma of the present times is that the information overload quickly goes over this limit (120 bits per sec), and with multiple information and visual bombardment, the brain has a diminished capacity to register, and hence cannot recall, thus leading to memory problems from an early age."
       Imagine the irony. On a daily basis, we are desperately trying to capture a moment for posterity all the while forgetting to live in it. On the other hand, we are forgetting half the things anyway as our brain doesn't register information beyond a point. We do not have any scope left to create any real memories, do we?



Friday, April 8, 2016

In 66 years, only six women judges in SC out of 229 ­Times of India 4/8/2016

In 66 years, only six women judges in SC out of 229 ­

Times of India 4/8/2016


In 66 years, only six women judges in SC out of 229 TNN | Apr 4, 2016, 03.36 AM IST Printed from S hani Shingnapur village in Maharashtra is the latest battlefield for women's equality. Several attempts by women to enter the Shani temple to break the custom that bars their entry have met with resistance. Ironically, the ancient temple is dedicated to Saturn, a planet that astrologically governs the character and well-being of people without discriminating between man and woman.

 It is difficult to say whether women's entry into a temple will usher in equality in a country that has for centuries discriminated among human beings on the basis of gender, caste, colour, creed, lineage and money. For example, will it force khaps to respect a woman's right to choose a life partner?

Women have periodically stormed many male bastions. I will not cite greats like Lata Mangeshkar or M S Subbulakshmi to drive home the point. But Indra Nooyi, Kiran Mazumdar Shaw, Chanda Kochar, Mary Kom, Saina Nehwal, Ekta Kapoor, Shahnaz Hussain are only a few among the many successful women who have done exceedingly well in a male-dominated world.

We all know Bachendri Pal, the first Indian woman to climb Mount Everest in 1984. We also know Santosh Yadav, the first woman in the world to climb Mount Everest twice. But do we know who Arunima Sinha is?

At the age of 24 in 2011, Sinha preferred to fight a gang of thugs in a moving train than surrender her gold chain. They threw her out of the train. One of her legs was amputated. Three years later, she scaled Mount Everest to become the world's first woman amputee to achieve the feat. Such stories never get eyeballs on social media. Absence of glamour? In the world of Nooyis, Shaws and Kochars, how many of us know Jyoti J Naik.

In 1973, at the age of 12, she joined Shri Mahila Griha Udyog Lijjat Papad, an organisation which was started in 1959 by seven women with a modest loan of Rs 80. From storekeeper, she worked hard and gradually climbed the ladder to become the president of the organisation, which is today a symbol of women's empowerment, employing over 30,000 women.

Lijjat Papad, despite providing employment and honour to women, could not compete with the glamour quotient of banking, finance, sports or the celluloid world. We and our inherent notions have created this barrier for women, who now want to notionally break it by storming into the Shani temple. The Shani temple doors will surely open for women. If not today, tomorrow. But despite the doors of the temples of justice — the courts — being open to women for decades, why have so few women entered it as judges?

After striking down the National Judicial Appointments Commission, a five-judge Supreme Court bench headed by Justice J S Khehar was examining the nature of reforms required to be infused into the process of selection of judges.

Women lawyers made a vociferous plea — the collegium which selects judges must shed its inhibition to choose woman lawyers as judges. "Look at their numbers. There are just 62 women judges compared to 611 male judges (in high courts) in the entire country," was their refrain. Justice Khehar replied, "What is the ratio of female advocates to male advocates? Ratio of female judges to male judges must be in the same ratio." Justice Khehar's response made them present statistics and plead that the collegium must not resort to ratio-based selection of woman judges.

They said women were allowed to practice only in 1922. At present, of the 24 high courts, nine do not have a single woman judge. Three have just one. Since 1950, when the Supreme Court was established, only six of its 229 judges have been women.
 In the judgment striking down NJAC, the SC had quoted an exchange between the then President and the Chief Justice of India regarding selection of judges.

President: "I would like to record my views that while recommending the appointment of Supreme Court judges, it would be consonant with constitutional principles and the nation's social objectives if persons belonging to weaker sections of society like SCs and STs, who comprise 25% of the population, and women are given due consideration. Eligible persons from these categories are available and their under-representation or non- representation would not be justifiable."

CJI: "I would like to assert that merit alone has been the criterion for selection of judges and no discrimination has been done while making appointments. All eligible candidates, including those belonging to the Scheduled Castes and Tribes, are considered by us while recommending names for appointment as Supreme Court judges. Our Constitution envisages that merit alone is the criterion for all appointments to the Supreme Court and high courts. And we are scrupulously adhering to these provisions. An unfilled vacancy may not cause as much harm as a wrongly filled vacancy."


Under no circumstance can only 6 women judges out of the total 229 in 66 years be a fair outcome of any "merit-alone" selection process. If women can climb Everest, head huge banks and financial institutions, run successful business houses, surely they can be good judges. The need of the hour is a change of mindset, both for the collegium headed by the CJI and the tradition bound Shani temple management.
-------------------##########################------------------------------------------